On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 20:03 +0200, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:46 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > Duplication is certainly bad. We have two ways to go: > > > > A) Not put the maintainers list in the DOAP files and have them in > > the MAINTAINERS file. The plan is that Pulse will be able to take > > the .doap files from the module and add in things like release > > information to create a more complete DOAP file. So maintainers > > could be added at that step. > > > > B) Drop MAINTAINERS and move the information to the DOAP file. > > (There would be some sort of transition period where we would > > support both.) > > > > I like B) better; I'd rather one file than a collection of little files. > > +1 from me too. > > Though I remember that the SVN policy required a MAINTAINERS file inside > the module in order to commit to it. Is this still valid for git? > (please forgive me if this has already been brought up in some other > thread).
"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams." i.e. it was our rule, and we can change it. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
