On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:12 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 19:05 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:22 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > Later: > > > Write notes, edit overview pages for things you maintain, > > > tell Pulse where you are so we can map our contributors, > > > participate in various collaborative features. Et cetera. > > > > Is stuff like merge request tracking also part of this (in an undefined > > future), or will that be part of a gitorious alike thing? > > Maybe. I generally take the practical approach of > letting other tools do what they do. > > Is it worth setting up yet another service just for > merge requests? Maybe. > > Is it worth adding a feature to Pulse that people > could get elsewise? Maybe. > > So, maybe. Depends on what people want and what > people are willing to hack on.
Unless we add something like gitorious, I'd imagine that "merge requests" would continue to be handled in bugzilla. A request to merge a branch is very similar to attaching a patch. - Owen _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
