On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
<[email protected]> wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
use for pango), it should be "1.2", not "1-2".
Yeap, IMHO pango-1-2< 1-2< 1.2< stable
It's nice to have "stable", but we need a fixed name for those branches too.
I'd love to see "stable" always be an alias for the latest stable branch, but
that doesn't obviate the need for "1.2" or pango-1-2.
behdad
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
