On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:36 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > > Good catch on libcanberra. It's clearly good for us > to have a convenient API for this. Do we really want > to push another micro-library for that? Should GTK+ > just learn to do it? > yeah, in fact, libcanberra provides a libcanberra-gtk lib which could be part of GTK. libcanberra itself, I guess, would need to keep as a separate lib for KDE and others to use it (if they do or plan to, which I'm not sure about) -- Rodrigo Moya <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
