2009/5/18 Ross Burton <[email protected]>: > > Whilst I'm a maintainer of GUPnP and think it's the best solution we > have for interoperating with other UPnP devices (of which they are many > in the wild), I really do think it's an ugly specification which hasn't > had any recent development. I also notice that Windows Vista includes > something I've forgotten the name of which they basically call the > successor to UPnP... >
Perhaps you are referring to DPWS [1] or DLNA [2]. For the second there is a good implementation here [3] [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devices_Profile_for_Web_Services [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance [3] http://coherence.beebits.net/ -- Javier Jardón Cabezas _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
