On Tue, 18.08.09 15:15, Jamie McCracken ([email protected]) wrote:
> > I should also add, inotify is not the ONLY technology which we have been > > discussing, setrlimit() is another and I could probably list a few > > others which we have been talking about with kernel developers. > > I would prefer if we avoid relying on kernel and inotify anyway (it will > never work on NFS in any event). We certainly dont want trackers > progress held up by kernel slackage kernel slackage? hehe. No disrespect but I am pretty sure that the kernel still gets at least a 100 times more commits per month than tracker does? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
