On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > We are sorry on *not* having communicated with the rest of GNOME about > this change, but we believed that all developers subscribed to bugs. > We would very much like to know which other mailing lists we should add > on.
The only mailing list that I ever assume GNOME developers are on is desktop-devel-list. When you say "subscribed to bugs", I can only assume you mean the gnome-bugsq...@gnome.org list which appears in the CC here. I have never heard of this mailing list until now. Is this something I should be subscribed to? About the change... I usually don't mark a bug CONFIRMED until a developer has confirmed it, and sometimes things slip through the cracks. This is especially the case with Enhancement bugs, because I only mark such bugs CONFIRMED if I intend to implement them in the short-term. Setting them to NEEDINFO seems a little awkward. NEEDINFO bugs tend to disappear from a lot of searches, but I guess with this change I'll need to start actively keeping an eye on that category. I'm not too freaked out about it, but at the same time I'm not sure how the change helps the bugsquad in the case of my modules. Sandy _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list