On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 14:22 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > > How can you be sure of that? Any other plan involves first writing and > > debugging a new set of software to support the gconf api on something > > else, then maintaining it for as long as we would have to maintain > > gconf, and this being new software it is likely going to be more work to > > maintain. > > I think Josselin is talking with his distro maintainer hat on (not as a > software maintainer): having to keep GTK+1.2 libs around for so long was > a pain.
I'm not sure I see the difference. He will have to maintain gconf in the distro, or he will have to maintain the newly written, not yet debugged, gconf-over-dconf replacement in the distroy for just as long time. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
