On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ted Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll ping usability and see if we can get this on the agenda for the > usability hackfest next week.
Awesome! > Yes, I think GTK/glib is a good place. One of the big blockers is the > requirement for DBus, Yes, clearly having glib-dbus in the stack today would help a lot; however gvfs already has an internal (private) connection, we can figure this out. I think having an internal non-public API would not be too hard. If it'll help move things along here I think I can schedule some of my time for this relatively soon, basically just move gvfs/gdbusutils.c to glib/gio/gbus-private.c. > I think that, as long as the APIs are really similar, porting from > libappindicator to the GAppIndicator (or whatever) shouldn't be too > difficult. That being said, how can we make sure the APIs are really > similar? Assuming the design doesn't change, any API delta (as long as it's not too egregious) is less interesting than the simple inertia effect of having created a lot of patches for various projects, and patching them again, even if it's almost a sed job. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
