On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 14:16 +0100, Christian Persch wrote: > Also, why is this LGPL 2&3-only instead of the usual LGPL > 2.1-or-later?
Because seriously, everything should be this way. None of us should be saying "LGPL 2.1 or later". Ask a lawyer, even one from the FSF, how much sense it makes to license your software that way. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
