Hi Bastien, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > > 2 things come to mind: > - Tracker shouldn't need to use D-Bus to access its database read-only: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613255
I couldn't agree more. So here is my plan: I will go with all plugin[1] external approach using the new D-Bus spec[2] . This will mean SLOW (its already very slow with my queries that has lots of optionals) tracker backend but I leave that for tracker guys to solve. They can either do what you asked for above or they can implement this D-Bus interface directly. > - The way you currently use Tracker means that there's no way to > differentiate between videos that I want indexed and searchable, and the > ones that I want to export. This is a privacy problem and could be > solved by making applications provide their catalogues instead (which > could be powered by Tracker). Actually this issue is partly solved. I made sure that tracker guys have the right ontology <caugh>..metadata keys for this. However, there is currently no UI for user to be able to mark media to be exported. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] Except the ones that serve gstreamer source elements & hence must be in-process but these are developer/test oriented. [2] http://live.gnome.org/Rygel/MediaServer2Spec _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
