On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 07:15 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > We don't have any concrete plans. However moving our tarballs to > GNOME > > FTP should pose no problem at all, likewise for i18n. Since we are > > talking daemons here i18n is not a big part of the project.
> > As for VCS and bug tracking it'll be quite a lot more work on our > part > > if we should move. I don't think anyone in the team is directly > > opposed to the idea, but it's more the fact that it would be a major > > inconvenience. We make heavy use of Launchpad's branc/review > features > > and integration with blueprints and bugs. Of course we can replace > > this with a hand held combination of bugzilla and wikipages, but it > > would be a major change in our workflow. For something that intends to be such a major part of GNOME, not using GNOME's git and bugzilla is a huge problem. Resisting that wouldn't make people optimistic about things in future. I can't believe that it's that big a deal for Zeitgeist, compared with what you'd gain when you need to work with a much larger set of developers, testers, and users. It's worth adapting, please, because being in the GNOME Desktop is more than just getting a stamp of approval. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
