Hi! > hi Vincent, > > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: >> Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use our >> platform but not GPLv2 apps? > > In short, yes. > > Anybody who has an application that is GPLv2-only and has accepted > enough contributions that it has become an unreasonable proposition to > relicense has made a significant mistake. I don't want to punish them > or anything, but they are the ones who picked a licence that prevents > them from linking against just about anything.
Well, while I guess all my modules are LGPL/GPLv2+ would that still prevent me from linking against LGPLv3 things if I don't convert them to GPLv3? Also, am I right that GPLv2+ means that I have GPLv2 in the COPYING but every file include the "or (at your option) any later version" clause? Regards, Johannes _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
