I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3. If glib switched under us it would make our license stability a bit of a joke. If someone wants to use glib under the lgpl3 they can do so now with the current license, if upstream changes however, people can not keep using it under the lgplv2.1 without forking.
Christian On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ryan Lortie <de...@desrt.ca> wrote: > > hi Everyone, > > > We have 3.0 upon us now, so I guess we should make a choice one way or > > another. > > I think any attempts to relicense the bigger platform libraries like > gtk or glib would end like the dbus relicensing efforts. > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
