2010/7/30 Johannes Schmid <[email protected]>: > Hi! > >> Something like "If you wrote a python plugin for GEdit/Rhythmbox/Totem >> then you need to rewrite/fix it to use pygobject gobject-introspection >> if you want it to work on GNOME 2.32 and GNOME 3.0"? > > Wouldn't it be more useful to just release a gedit 2.30.5 for 2.32 and > focus on getting all this plugin porting stuff done for 3.0 in a clean > way?
+1 !!!! I don't get why people is getting so upset about the delay, IMHO I think we should just release whatever was in 2.30 with critical bugfixes and whatnot and push forward for 3.0 in master. > > I mean, feature freeze is in one week technically and we delayed the > release now which means people really don't expect us to be totally > awesome for the 2.32 release. We can pull in all the simple features but > I don't think it's a good idea to put too much effort into that for > modules that already got along for 3.0 pretty well. > > I think that should be the same for the GSettings conversion if we > cannot use the gconf-backend for 2.32. I really wouldn't like to ship > both dconf and gconf for 2.32 because it's going to be a mess. > > Let's face it: We are delayed! And we are OK with it! > > Regards, > Johannes > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > -- Un saludo, Alberto Ruiz _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
