Le lundi 11 octobre 2010, à 23:20 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen a écrit : > I would like to elaborate on one very important thing that you > mention, and that is that if a project chooses not to follow the GNOME > release schedule, the key is information. So when/(if) this happens it > has to be extremely visibly, preferably right there in l10n.org. So I > would suggest as a technical detail to your proposal, that it is a > _requirement_ for project maintainers of projects that don't follow > the GNOME release schedule, to not only document it in their > development fora, but also to publish a (tentative) string freeze and > release date somewhere in the repository, so that it can be > automatically parsed and published on damned lies.
Good point. It's fair to expect projects not using the GNOME development cycle to publish a schedule with freezes. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list