On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:18 +0100, Juanjo Marin wrote: > >> Is it possible that those computers have a rather old version of >> gdk-pixbuf? That function was added in June: >> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=330f9555cdb557abd7a5bfff4f4127bacd0653fc > > I'll have to check on the slave if the gtkmm build for some reason > chooses to build against the system gdk-pixbuf. The jhbuild tree > certainly contains a successful build of gdk-pixbuf git master. >
Turns out this was caused by old gdk-pixbuf headers in the installed tree, from before gdk-pixbuf was separated (ie under $includedir/gtk-3.0/gdk-pixbuf) - those were found before the standalone gdk-pixbuf headers. The next rebuild should work better. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
