On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:13:21PM +0000, Javier Jardón wrote: > On 2 March 2011 14:01, David King <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2011-03-02 13:46, Javier Jardón <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I think would be better dist-xz instead, as xz displaced the lzma > >> format some time ago [1] > >> > > > > This seems like another good reason to push the (proposed) autotools > > modernisation goal: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/ModernAutotools > > > > at least once someone adds the dist-xz suggestion to that page. ;) > > Done :) > > BTW, any objection to change the status of this from propossed to an > approved GnomeGoal?
The current install-module doesn't handle anything other than .gz or .bz2. So cannot make such a change now. Makes sense to allow .xz, even if ftp.gnome.org would only host bz2 (quicker tarball uploads). Want to wait a bit for enough feedback. I'd like to go for one format only. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
