Hi! After reading Alan's and David's comment it occurs to me that it could be way simpler to have a dbus-service handling the desktop files and anybody wanting to access the desktop files in a fast way can use that service (through a library wrapper).
This would make all the cache problems much easier as there would be only one process touching the cache at all. Sync/Async support comes from dbus basically for free. Just my 2 cents, Johannes Am Freitag, den 25.03.2011, 07:16 -0400 schrieb Colin Walters: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:03 AM, David Zeuthen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sounds good, but we really want a session-service [0] instead of a > > system-service > > I would say system *and* session service. But honestly I'm not too > concerned right now about overhead of apps installed in ~/.local, > since it's not where huge swaths of crud typically lives. > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
