Hi, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Alberto Mardegan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/27/2011 07:01 PM, David Zeuthen wrote: >>> So yes, I'd say that embedding a HTML engine is fairly important. Being >>> able to support the user's own browser is probably a good idea too though. >> >> Yeah, I want to make this possible, on a per-service basis, as well. > > Yes, if you have service plugins or configuration files you could > specify whether the OAuth callback should be a local webserver or a > normal web page, and then have your own browser widget.
The code is already arranged this way - but we don't load 3rd party plug-ins. And this is on purpose. Anyway, in this case, it would just be a property on the GoaBackendOAuth2Provider base class http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/goa-20110427/GoaBackendOAuth2Provider.html which the Google and Facebook implementations already use. I will add support for this soon. David _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
