Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Luca Ferretti <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 18.14 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto: > >> > So? Why this should be a failure? >> > >> Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is, >> surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the >> experience. > > So, are there no system settings or personalizations other then the ones > provided by GNOME? 6.x billions of people and only ten (or so) settings > panel? > >> We should strive to make this as easy as possible and having 20 >> panels such as "Java Settings" or "HTTPD Control" or even "Firewall" >> is something that gets in the way. So if we allowed 3rd party panels, >> it would be a failure because trusting that people won't write broken >> panels like the ones mentioned above is, unfortunately, very naive. > > > Wait: first, it's GNOME3, not GNOME2, you can't provide a new panel > simply adding a .desktop file with proper keys. You have to develop it > using proper API. This is a first barrier for broken stuff. > > Second: are we a censorship? are we fighting against the ugly? are all > non-gnome developers odd and stupid? > > It seems your starting point is: everybody's wrong, but not GNOME > people. I feel it really offensive and counterproductive for GNOME > project itself.
Speaking of offensive, suggesting that GNOME is a censorship is pretty offensive. Not to mention insulting. I'm not going to have a conversation with you like this. Please keep it real. Thanks, David _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
