On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 18:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Robert Ancell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I was not going to propose this project because I am sick of this sort >> > of unprofessional response, especially from leaders in the community. > >> So, you consider it an unprofessional response if we are not falling >> over our feet in adopting a from-scratch rewrite of a core component >> that has not even been field-tested in any release yet ? > > I think Robert's point was rather the disrespect shown by some wordings > in responses ("architecture astronaut", anyone?) which is demotivating > and makes the GNOME community look hostile. >
I believe this is a situation which makes or breaks the feeling of community within GNOME. That is, this is a big deal. There is a GNOME Code of Conduct at https://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct though the thread participants did not sign it. I think the GNOME Foundation should step in, if the attitude issues are not resolved completely within this thread. Simos _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
