On 08/13/11 20:37, Luca Bruno wrote: > For example, I personally prefer the documentation to be using > language-specific tools, because I'm using that programming language. > I don't care about uniformity among all the languages, rather I care > about bindings consistency (which is often per-language due to additional > mapping/overrides/metadata) and language documentation consistency. Both way have theirs merrits. My initial mail was meant to get feedback to understand what we want. I am fine if bindings people would prefer to get bindings docs into the same look and feel as the language docs. If just feel its going to look like a mess on library.gnome.org then. > What if a new language adds bindings for GI? Do you want to add the new > language to the gtk-doc tool? I'd rather provide a better common platform for > creating consistent per-language documentation. > > Hope I haven't missed important points of the discussion. > The other question really was that whether people that work on language bindings docs are happy with the tools or not. I have no idea how bindings docs are done (probably different for each language). I was assuming that there is potential to share techniques and make things more automated.
Stefan > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
