On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 01/19/2012 10:32 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >>> >>> But others (folks at least) fail to compile with 0.15. >> >> >> This question might seem a little naive, but could someone highlight me why >> the vala compiler can't stay backward compatible from release to release? > > Indeed. Until vala grows up a little more, its increasing use in the > desktop is a growing problem.
Being a maintainer of 2 vala projects in GNOME, I can tell you that valac itself is pretty stable these days and it gets more and more stable all the time. The issue is the bindings usually. There are way too many of the libraries to take care of and on top of that they change all the time. Ideally each library should be providing vala bindings and take care of keeping it up2date. So its really not a fault of vala itself. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
