On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 10:54 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > 2012/1/23 Olav Vitters <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:14:32AM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > >> Why do you guys insist in making that a Canonical,Ubuntu issue? > > > > Only that distribution is affected by the functionality change right > > (relying on API that atm is only provided by systemd)? All the other > > distributions have systemd, so they didn't need to be made aware (though > > we should've). > > > > Am I missing something? I guess Debian? Didn't see anyone raise that > > up to now. > > Or maybe people aren't very happy of the tone of the discussion and > don't want to be dragged into it (and that is why I didn't reply when > openSUSE was mentioned). > > This change is also problematic for people who might not be using the > last version of their distribution > or who have issue with systemd which aren't fixed yet and are forced > to use sysvinit.
Requires: systemd-services And have a Provides: systemd-services in the systemd RPM. The problem isn't exactly insurmontable. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
