On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 18:08, Stefan Sauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: >> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote: >>> Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take >>> over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml at >>> all. >>> Just go from an intermediate representation to html *without* xslt. >>> libxslt is literally dead and other processors are even slower. >> libxslt is not slow. The XSLT stylesheets that gtk-doc uses are slow. >> It's true that it's not really actively developed, but it's basically >> complete as an XSLT 1.0 processor and doesn't need to be constantly >> changed. > Yes, you are partially right. But its both. For once libxslt is single > threaded (also on chunked output). > > Just saying, that it might be a good occation to get rid of xslt processing.
and XSLT stylesheets are IMHO a pain to write and even more to maintain, as soon as they are not trivial. > > Stefan >> -- >> Shaun >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> desktop-devel-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
