On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote:

> Seif Lotfy <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> > There are 3 issues in discussion or in development where Zeitgeist
> > integration is reaching a halt due to the uncertainty of where Zeitgeist
> > stands:
> >
> > Epiphany (Web): There has long been discussions on how to deploy
> Zeitgeist
> > as a backend for Web. Web needed to rethink its history problem. It
> ended up
> > with developing an SQLite based history backend. Right now we are
> discussing
> > replacing this backend with Zeitgeist, since Zeitgeist can do everything
> the
> > SQLite backend can. plus we can add new features to Web that make use of
> > Zeitgeist's Full-Text-Search capabilities for "searching" via the uri
> bar.
>
> We don't have a design for browser history search in Web yet [1].
>

This has nothing to do with design honestly. This is a way to save history.
Make it easier and more efficient for Web to store/retrieve history. How
would that effect the UX?


>
> > Folks: I added some new properties to the individuals class in folks
> > (currently in review). Now I could give more detail and allow the
> Contacts
> > app to sort individuals by recency/frequency of interaction. The
> telepathy
> > backend for this feature needs Zeitgeist. The Telepathy backend can
> provide
> > even more info such as "Show me all files sent to X or recevied from X"
> > (same goes for URIs). This feature was requested by Garrett LeSage from
> the
> > GNOME Design team.
>
> That was considered in the Contacts design process, but it was decided
> that it wasn't appropriate/useful.
>

I am not challenging  this decision but fwiw I sort my GTalk contacts via
most popular. Which is something I think calculated via "frequency of
use"/"recently used". Does this mean having this option in the Folks
library (which is something not UI or UX related) not allowed.

> Clocks: The clocks app is designed by the GNOME designers. It is still
> more
> > or less a prototype I am working on alongside Emily Gonyer. We wanted to
> > make use of Zeitgeist in storing "Alarms" as a type of "scheduled
> event", it
> > sounds like shoehorning but it is not. I am just hesitant because I
> myself
> > as a GNOME member do not want to use a technology or force integrate it
> > without GNOME agreeing of the usage of Zeitgeist.
>
> It might help for you to elaborate why Zeitgeist is needed there.
> Clocks is intended to be a really simple application.
>

We need to be able to store Alarms. And those alarms should still work
while the clocks application is closed. For that we need a central storage
for the scheduled event which is the alarm, to notify all subscribers
including Shell that an alarm went off. Same would go for timers.
What do you think?


>
> > As I see also there is some ideas going around for the searching via
> Shell.
> > I agree that every application should be able to provide it search
> results
> > to shell (aggregated search). I think Zeitgeist could fit in there
> nicely to
> > sort the aggregated results globally according to recency or frequency.
>
> There are some designs in development for shell search [2], and these
> have implications for how we want search results to be returned within
> individual applications. I don't have the expertise to comment on
> which technologies are required to implement those.
>
> As mentioned previously in this thread, I'd expect to see a specific
> feature proposal for 3.6, rather than a module proposal. A new feature
> might require new dependencies, of course (which you might have to
> justify, I
> guess). You could certainly propose Clocks as a feature for 3.6...
>

I really would rather have the technologies I am allowed to use figured out
before I continue with alarms. Currently Emily is doing some more designing.


>
> Allan
>
> [1] https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Web#Tentative_Design
> [2] https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/Search
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>

Cheers
Seif
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to