On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 13:12 +0200, Piñeiro wrote: > On 04/25/2012 02:37 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > >> As the plugin does not do anything when no AT is loaded, > > OK; that seems to be a relatively recent change (from my admittedly > > distant perspective). If that's true, and recently the primary cost of > > a11y has (at least in theory) been deferred to when an AT is loaded, > > then I'm totally in favor of this change. > > This change was made the last year. It started with this commit [1], > that prevented to add event listeners if no AT is listening. This also > includes the creation of the accessible objects or the message > forwarding to DBUS. Additionally, one student was making some tests to > check if this leads to a real improvement of the performance/memory > consumption when accessibility is on but no accessibility technology is > listening [2]. This change was made the last year, tested and debugged > since then.
I see, very nice work! Thanks for explaining this to me. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
