1. ibus is buggy 2. Even though iBus is perfect, it should not be the integrated IM of gnome, if only ibus is integrated, the only thing i can do is just give up gnome because ibus cannot meet my need, if only fcitx is integrated, maybe ibus users would give up gnome because they need ibus
3. U MUST give users choices. 4. There is a solution like "input method frameworks' framework" which can be integrated with most im frameworks, just like KDE's kimpanel. On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 00:03 +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote: > > Actually I see this is an impossible mission for gnome. > > > > I see no one here really understand the real needs of input method. > > Fix UI? That's not the main problem of ibus. > > I'm having a very hard time following this. Can somebody who knows > what they're talking about (like you or Marguerite) give details on > what the main problems with IBus actually are? You say many users > prefer other IM frameworks, and I believe you, but I don't know why > exactly. How is IBus failing them? > > -- > Shaun > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > -- Open Source,Open Mind Blog: http://bigeagle.me/ E-mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
