On 13/05/12 09:43, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi everyone,
Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
down to two voices and this:
Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
name of better UX, and are looking at IBus as the underlying technology,
Users: IBus has poor support for CJK input and a history of not
addressing these problems.
The developers desire for improving the UX is commendable, but without
core functionality there is no UX regardless of how sweet the UI; in the
UX contest ugly menu wins over no keyboard hands down; Linux users will
put up with a lot, but I dare to say (though I am not a UX designer!) we
all draw the line at not being able to use the keyboard.
CJK represents a big target user group that Gnome cannot afford to
ignore; it would seem to me that the necessary conclusion here is that,
at this point in time, IBus is not a suitable candidate for a singular
IM framework supported by Gnome, and that any plans for immediate IM
improvements need to be rethought to avoid hard IBus dependency.
Very well said. I could not agree more.
Tomas
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list