On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:09AM +0800, Justin Wong wrote: >> GNOME provide machanism, IMFs provide implementation. >> >> I know it will not be a easy job, but it's something that should be done. >> >> Whichever IMF u now choose as the only IMF for gnome, u are KILLING othe >> IMFs, so do u think other IMFs' developers work worth nothing? >> >> PLEASE, calm down, slow down, and discuss about how to provide a machanism, >> and how IMFs can be integrated. > > I am calm. Be technical and all is fine. > > Saying "KILLING" in capitals is NOT acceptable. > > Yes, I'm sure you do great things. But what matters to me is the way the > discussion is held. You can be the greatest person ever, but if your > messages are not following some proper conversation styles, I will > continue to either warn or ban. > > Saying "KILLING" is just distracting. It adds nothing of value to the > discussion. > > -- > Regards, > Olav > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi, I can't agree more. anyway here's a tech list. not users' help desk. so feel free to ban anything anyone against the rule, ignore the non-tech reply, the support/resist thing, because they doesn't have any point or make any sense.(including some of mine) it's far away from tech recently. I gave my effect to remove(and removed) the source where angry boosters in C community gathered. it might help. but I don't know. and personally(this word is not good here) I support GNOME's IBUS decision and hope it can be implemented to help the newbies, since "the other IM developer(s)" has promised there're a lot of ways to make things happen. Marguerite _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
