On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Weng Xuetian <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't like your argue even your are arguing for fcitx actually. > No matter for IBus, fcitx, gcin, or hime, or scim which is > unmaintained now, or maliit which is developed target for on-screen > keyboard, they are want to provide better experience. > The most important reason for those project not merging together is > kinds of different Philosophy and different view on same problem. > But the target for those project are all for providing better > experience for typing or input under Linux. We respect each other, and > actually learn from each other. This is very common in open source > even real world. Sometimes people become angry and could not calm, or > make some criticism, is that they find something far away from their > target. But that can be solved with proper communication. > So there was some misunderstanding, but it was past. I respect all the projects. But I insist that having different frameworks confuse users. Partially because I was confused. I doubt whether such philosophy difference must be reflected in the framework level. For example, people say gcin/hime rocks in cangjie/quick. But I'm studying whether the final UX difference is mainly because of the difference in table data? Or fcitx and ibus's table engines just miss some substitution features? https://github.com/caleb-/hime/tree/master/filter That's why I actively support integration previously.
> Actually I'm discussing with people who are working on ibus > integration, and even for integration on ibus I can find something may > be not right and I'd like to provide my help on it. I respect you very much on this. Your attitude is very different from that of a Unity bug :) But I have to point out possible challenges. Please correct me for any fact mistakes! _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
