On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ma Xiaojun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Aron Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >> What do you mean by "separate implementation"? > "those IMF developers spend so many time to implement XKB support > (ibus-xkb, fcitx-keyboard)?" > >> This question does not make sense because engines are not maintained >> by IMF, their status cannot be improved by IMF either. > AFAIK, @csslayer commits most new (after Yuking's origin fcitx paused > development) code in fcitx project. > Definitely, he should be maintaining engines and IMF at the same time. > For IBus, I think its github page shows who maintains which component clearly. > https://github.com/ibus >
They are not engines, but wrappers, the glue of the engine and IMF. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
