Hi, On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:45:34AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> I would like to get your clarification about what's your decision on >> IBus integration because all of us haven't reached to an agreement on >> the whole thing. While I feel that you'll do it regardless of > > From what I understood, you can still have different input methods. It > is just that IBus will be default. With work, you can still setup > something different. >
Yep, but the problem I'm still not willing to see it get merged is that current code will make IBus broken. The correct approach to resolve XKB and Input method integration is letting input method framework to handle XKB representing GNOME, IMHO. > Please don't revert commits, that's is not the way to do things. > > FWIW, I found previous threads to be utterly confusing. I had to read > the LWN summary to make sense out of them > (https://lwn.net/Articles/503320/). > The LWN article is a great summary, but some of the wording indicates the editor still lacks a bit of researching. For example, I'm one of the most active input method maintainer in Debian and Ubuntu, and I do care much about both IBus and Fcitx. In my personal opinion, I'll use Fcitx for my daily work and advocate its bright future, but I do know that IBus currently is more useful for some people, please don't think I myself is simply a Fcitx fanboy. -- Regards, Aron Xu _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
