Hello Travis,

Travis Reitter [2013-02-17 22:24 -0800]:
> Speaking of test failures - is it possible to get more details? All I
> can seem to turn up for the "folks" module test failures are:
> 
> "make check failed for folks
> Check log file for details"
> 
> But I can't seem to find the corresponding log from here:
> 
> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%
> 20Gnome/job/jhbuild-amd64-folks/lastSuccessfulBuild/testReport/junit/folks/test/make_check/

On the main page, click on folks, which leads you to

https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/job/jhbuild-amd64-folks/

There, click on the topmost build in the left column, or use one of
the permalinks like "last build":

  
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/job/jhbuild-amd64-folks/lastBuild/

There you see the complete log file.

> Also, most modules say "1 of 1 tests {failed, succeeded}". I guess this
> is a side effect of "make check" being somewhat monolithic. Is there any
> way modules can increase the granularity reported for tools like
> Jenkins?

I think that ought to be possible by integrating gtester-report and
add a new target such as "make check-report" or "make gtester-report"
(I think glib already does that), which we then could call from
jhbuild and (1) export as an artifact, and (2) present as test results
instead of the monolithic pass/fail one.

Martin


-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to