Hey, Matthias, could you explain more on gtester faults or propose alternatives?
Just for explanation - I proposed this change as gtester produces nice html report and XML output, which, being converted to JUnit XML, can be used to collect stats of failing tests - this can be used to spot unstable tests. Note, that this feature is not essential (EDS bug doesn't replace old 'make check' system), but might be very useful. Thanks, Vadim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthias Clasen" <[email protected]> To: "Tristan Van Berkom" <[email protected]> Cc: "GNOME release team" <[email protected]>, "desktop-devel-list" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:07:27 PM Subject: Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> wrote: > Did I miss some important information (i.e. is this already done somewhere > at least partially and I'm not aware of it) ? > I'd really rather get off gtester - as you've noticed, it is somewhat lacking, and the Makefile integration is really not great. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692125 for my attempt at this. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
