Hi, Overall, it is much better than 3.6 However, I still find quite a few issues:
A. Input methods coverage A.1 ibus-chewing is not included. This engine, which provides Bopomofo [1] support, is important for users in Taiwan region and others. (Note that Bopomofo engine provided by ibus-pinyin/ibus-libpinyin is basically useless since it hasn't real tone support.) A.2 ibus-pinyin instead of ibus-libpinyin is included. I believe that ibus-libpinyin is supposed to be "the future" [2] A.3 ibus-hangul is not included, the only Korean engine I'm aware of. B. Shortcut for input source switching The default shortcut is Super + space, which is same as Mac OS X. FYI, previous versions of IBus, Microsoft Windows uses Ctrl + space. C. Candidate window The candidate window shows left/right arrows only after one page up/down operation. Is this a good design? D. (Upstream) context menu and/or symbol of some engines are not good enough. You can try Pinyin and quick*/cangjie* to see whether you are happy with their context menu and/or symbol. I will inform upstream soon. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bopomofo 2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ibus-libpinyin _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
