On 24 April 2013 11:57, Florian Müllner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The main point is that so-called "controversial" features does not have > to > > be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be > shipped as > > default, but with a way to revert them in the case they block the user. > > Wait - are you suggesting to create a fork each time a controversial > change is made? no.
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
