On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Milan Crha <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>         Hi,
> I do not know this API, neither use it (yet?), but the first version
> seems more correct to me, because with the second you define some hidden
> constraint where the 'priv' structure comes from. If nothing else, then
> this should be properly documented, to avoid any confusion in the
> future.
>

You have a point. I've renamed the macros, and added 2 new ones:

gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_private
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal_private

Sorry for the api churn. Things will stay put now.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to