Hi librsvg-authors,
librsvg is listed as being dual licensed (GPL and LGPL) in Wikipedia and in the 
sources we see two files COPYING (GPL) and COPYING.LIB  (LGPL).
So can we handle librsvg as being LGPL'ed? If yes I'd suggest to change the 
Appendix A of the "RSVG Library Reference 
Manual<https://developer.gnome.org/rsvg/2.40/licence.html>" which mentions the 
GPL license only.
Thanks
Martin

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to