On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > I have no experience with either of those so won't comment on that. > But > surely aesthetics don't drive your choice of development tools?
I don't think it'd be a good idea to release a hypothetical GNOME IDE that was not well-integrated with the rest of the GNOME desktop. > Netbeans defaults to the (slightly buggy) Gtk+ L&F on Linux. > Personally > I just change the L&F parameter to Nimbus and IMHO that looks pretty > nice. The important point is that it is a mature (and fully open) IDE. Oh really -- didn't know that. But I've watched my friend use Netbeans on GNOME just a couple months ago, and the menus, file choosers etc. look distinctly 1990s Java-esque, nothing at all like other GTK+ apps. I guess he could have changed the look and feel settings, but I doubt it....
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
