On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 13:09 +0000, Allan Day wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for reaching out with your ideas. I'm afraid that you're > catching us at a bad time - we are really close to UI freeze and a lot > of us are working flat out on that. I personally don't have much time > to spare on mailing lists right now. :) > > Can you explain what the GNOME 2 sub-project would actually look like? > It's hard to respond without knowing details about how it would > actually work. I understand that you are proposing to utilise some > GNOME 3 modules, but how would it differ? Would it have a 3.x > gnome-control-center? Would it have a shell? If not, which pieces > would you use instead? Would you expect the GNOME project to make > regular GNOME 2 releases alongside GNOME ones? Would we work to ensure > we produce quality GNOME 2 releases as well as GNOME 3 releases? How > would we market these two experiences? What would we recommend to > distributions?
The main question for me would be, why would we want a "GNOME 2"-like sub-project in GNOME when we dropped support for a very similar interface, the fallback mode. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
