On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Sébastien Wilmet <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2014-08-02 at 15:55 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-08-02 at 15:21 +0200, drago01 wrote: >> > Well you could just create a branch do your release there so that you >> > don't have to care about what happens on master (branches are free in >> > git) and merge it back to master afterwards. >> >> In GNOME we generally prefer to have a linear git history, but creating >> a branch is indeed another solution. > > (replying to myself after a bit more thoughts) > > I think it's the best compromise. I've never thought about this solution > because I always do a rebase on top of master. Thanks for the tip!
Actually thats what I usually do but trouble with this approach is that I often then forget that I'm on the branch and assume everything went fine after doing a successfull `git push origin master && git push origin TAG`. Later I realize that master has changed and my tag is not in its history. :( -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
