hi; On 30 December 2014 at 19:08, Stefan Sauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/29/2014 01:28 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: >> hi; >> >> On 29 December 2014 at 12:11, Stefan Sauer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gdk/tmpl >>> ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gtk/tmpl >>> ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/libgail-util/tmpl >> we may port gtk2, but I'm not sure about bumping the dependency on a >> "frozen" branch… > The gtk-doc dependency? 1.11 is good enough, the tmpl free build was > added in 1.8 (Feb 16 2007).
I'll have a go at fixing gtk2, then. >>> ./gconf/doc/gconf/tmpl >>> ./gtkhtml/doc/tmpl >> aren't these two deprecated? we don't ship anything with gconf any >> more for sure… >> >>> ./seed/doc/reference/tmpl >> what's the status of seed? isn't it unmaintained? >> >> ciao, >> Emmanuele. > Thanks for checking. At some point those modules will need to use an old > version of gtk-doc to build their docs. In jhbuild we could use > --disable-gtkdoc if we still need to build them. we don't usually build with gtk-doc in jhbuild — at least, I don't know of anybody that adds '--enable-gtk-doc' to the autogenargs. ciao, Emmanuele. -- http://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
