OK... So they just stay "new" then... I'm not sure that would give the original
reporter the impression that something is being done, but as long as the bugs
do get confirmed, sorted, whatever then any simplification may be helpful...
On February 13, 2015 6:20:15 PM CET, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 18:15 +0100, Rick Opper wrote:
>> Then how will project devs know if a bug is - as the status implies -
>> not yet confirmed? It may be a problem with a single users unique
>> setup,
>
>Which is still a bug, and it's still "new".
>
>> or a design decision
>
>RESOLVED WONTFIX
>
>> , or caused by something specific to a certain distribution...
>
>RESOLVED NOTGNOME
>
>> Isn't that the point of this tag?
>
>There are other statuses available which already cover those cases.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
