On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote: > Hi, > > having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I > noticed that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird > mixure > of LGPL v2 versions. The text and version comes from the "old" > Library > GPL 2, but as a license name we use "Lesser GPL" in the headers but > Library GPL in the COPYING file. > > Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to > "proper" > LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean > this > up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)?
Pretty sure all those versions are compatible, so this shouldn't be a problem. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
