On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 21:40 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi, > > Philip Withnall wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > > I'm a bit surprised by 1) but we could certainly automatically > > > produce > > > a list of maintainers / modules/ time/commits since last release, > > > if > > > that could be useful. > > > > I think 1) would be useful because I have a load of modules which I > > am > > not sure if they need to follow the main GNOME release schedule. I > > had > > a nagging fear they should, but then nobody poked me about doing a > > release, so I forgot to check up further. As a result, a lot of my > > modules haven’t had releases following the schedule. (Sorry if I > > have > > been a total pain because of this.) > > > > Would such a list be useful for the release team, as a way of > > tracking > > who needs nagging? If so, then I hope producing it should not be > > too > > much of a drain on your time — if it is a drain, then you probably > > shouldn’t do it. > > This was mostly done manually (at least as far I am concerned), but > here is an experiment, > https://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/health/wanted-releases.html > > And the red modules are first targets. > > (this has been generated from my local clones, updated a few hours > ago, if it's something we want to pursue it would be quite nice to > have this automated and running on GNOME infrastructure) (the disk > requirements exclude openshift).
Nice! If it's not much effort to get this running on GNOME infrastructure, I think it would be useful, and have it linked from the release reminder e-mails. What do the x/y numbers mean? Philip
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
