I also think it is sometimes important to discuss about the big picture, even if it is just pipe dreams.
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:53:28AM +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > I really love the ideas of try servers, and you know they have this some > how in github, and man, we should try to find clever means to do the same > thing. >From my naive point of view, a try server would be more complicated to implement and integrate into the gnome.org infrastructure, and it would be a big change for contributors and maintainers. When doing such changes, the biggest challenge comes from the people, not from the technical aspect of it. My (again, naive) proposal with the master/master-stable-next/master-stable branches [1] seems easier to implement to me and the advantage is that contributors and maintainers don't need to change how they work. Of course a try server would be nice too, but it can be done separately. [1] The more I think about it the more it becomes complicated, I know the Devil is in the details (or God is in the details. Whatever is in the details it is something important). -- Sébastien _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
