On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:10:59PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Yet this is what you're doing. If you want an application to be > renamed, you'd better make sure that you can actually come up with a > good name, and argue why it is an insurmountable problem to call the > package "gnome-games-app" or similar in your distribution.
gnome-games-center ? Like gnome-control-center. Anyway, the plugins of gnome-games will maybe be tricky to package. Isn't a Flatpak sufficient? The purpose of Flatpak is to avoid all the duplicated work of packaging in all the distros. I have always seen that as a big waste of time. For new apps, does it really make sense to package them in the traditional manner? -- Sébastien _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
