I think installed test etc it's not going to happen or be maintained if we
don't enable coverage with it too. I think that's the actual trick that will
keep us up with the initiative.
So I would go with both since the start, and together.
Best regards,
Carlos Soriano
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: GNOME goal candidates
Local Time: March 1, 2017 8:05 PM
UTC Time: March 1, 2017 7:05 PM
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:31:24AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> OK, you all have changed my mind. I guess installed tests should be a
> goal.
>
> Do we want to do this for coverage as well...?
https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/AddCodeCoverage
The page needs to be updated for AX_CODE_COVERAGE. But I would keep it,
at least to have a list of best-practices as Emmanuele said.
--
Sébastien
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
